Intravenous EDTA Chelation Therapy
(For an appointment with Dr. Kennedy in Santa Rosa, CA, write to firstname.lastname@example.org.)
Chelation (pronounced key-lay-shun) is a chemical reaction that results in a bond being formed between a metal ion and an organic (i.e., carbon-based — made mostly of carbon) molecule. The resulting complex, metal bound to molecule, is called a "chelate" and contains one or more rings of atoms in which the metal ion is so firmly bound it cannot escape. This allows the metal ion to be transported in the same manner as a prisoner, first handcuffed, then moved from one location to another.
In the presence of aging and disease, the cells’ ability to move metal and mineral ions through the system and eliminate them when they are in excess becomes progressively impaired. This is especially true for calcium.
Calcium has vital functions in the human body. Without calcium, teeth and bones could not exist. Nevertheless, as the body ages, calcium builds up progressively in all tissues. The effect this has on the vascular system leads to arteriosclerosis.
There are two common forms of vascular disease, arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis. We will first consider atherosclerosis. This is plaque formation on the inisde of the arterial system. It has an entirely different causation than arteriosclerosis which is diffuse hardening of the arteries.
There are several known, and easily avoided, risk factors at work in the creation of atherosclerosis. Lipid peroxidation and the presence of certain micro-organisms are thought to begin the inflammatory process in the wall of the artery and is facilitated by the presence of: (1) polyunsaturated fatty acids (present in many "junk-foods"), (2) oxidized cholesterol (from cooked, i.e., pasteurized, milk and other animal foods cooked in open air), (3) the relative absence of antioxidants, such as vitamins A, C and E, and (4) high levels of homocysteine (a condition easily prevented with vitamins B6 and B12). Tobacco smoke drains the body’s resources of antioxidants, particularly vitamin C, and further accelerates atherosclerosis. If you know and apply these facts from an early age, there is no reason for atherosclerosis to develop in your body. To know and apply these facts, you have to be willing to think for yourself and ah, there is the reason atherosclerosis will continue to kill people. Maybe the good do die young but so do the uninformed and dogmatic.
"Hardening of the arteries," or arteriosclerosis, on the other hand, is apparently an almost inevitable change of aging. However it is greatly accelerated by the intake of calcium carbonate. The main source of this stuff is tap water, but an even more potent source is well water. Mineral water and commercial "drinking water" also contains calcium carbonate. Filtered water also has it and even reverse osmosis removes only 80% of it. Foods are "enriched" by the additon of calcium carbonate, such as most orange juice preparations. Some calcium supplments contain this stuff, because it is cheap. Common antacids, such as Tums, are made of calcium carbonate.
As calcium collects in the walls of arteries, they become stiffer, as does all connective tissue of the body. In addition to calcium, this stiffening is caused by cross-linkage of collagen, the protein which makes up the connective tissue of artery walls. This cross-linkage results in loss of elasticity and flexibility. We believe the process can be slowed, but not entirely prevented, by the liberal intake of antioxidants, especially vitamin C.
With atherosclerosis, as the years pass, calcium deposits build up as part of the healing process which follows inflammation ignited by lipid peroxidation and micro-organisms, and calcified atherosclerotic plaques form, lining the walls of the arterial vessels. This plaque is composed of various lipids, so-called foam cells, scar tissue, and overgrown smooth muscles cells from the artery wall. In many people, this process begins in early childhood.
With arteriosclerosis, calcium also builds up and becomes many times more concentrated in the wall of the normal artery than it was in childhood. Calcium content is what atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis have in common. Aging can be thought of as a progressive dysfunction of calcium metabolism which involves the entire body, not just the arterial wall.
The exact content of the plaques is determined by the individual’s diet, antioxidant intake and duration of the process. Regardless of where on the atherosclerotic continuum any particular individual falls, the result is the same: less and less fresh oxygen delivered to the tissues of the body.
It once was thought this process began in middle or old age. It is now known to begin in childhood in many people. The severity of this life-long process is determined by genetics, lifestyle, and level of exercise and dietary habits. By age 21, many individuals have arterial disease, easily recognized at surgery or autopsy.
This is a disease of modern civilization. Never before have people so young had atherosclerosis. As recently as the year 1900, heart disease was very rare. It may be that airborne industrial pollutants, as well as herbicides, pesticides and preservatives in our food, have something to do with the development of atherosclerosis. Even more likely is the advent of hydrogenated fats, e.g. margarine, the temporal development of which perfectly coincides with the increase in vascular disease.
The cholesterol content of these plaques can be handled by shifting to a no-fat, high-fiber diet. Plaques actually decrease in size, and the cholesterol content can eventually disappear. Lipid peroxidation itself can be halted by the liberal intake of antioxidants such as Beta-carotene (the precursor of vitamin A), mixed tocopherols (vitamin E) and vitamin C, so no further damage is caused to the arterial tree. In addition, the amino acid arginine is now known to convert to nitric oxide which is a powerful protective agent for the vascular lining. It may be that people who supplement arginine in high doses continuously never develop arterial plaque.
The calcium content of the scar-plaques already present is another matter. Diet and pure water have little effect on it. Therefore, if you want to restore your health to a completely youthful condition, you are facing a real challenge.
The list of problems that can be caused by artery disease is truly impressive, but it should not be surprising that it is so extensive given that a fresh supply of oxygenated blood is absolutely necessary for proper functioning in any organ. Even diseases that are more complicated, in that they have causes other than decreased blood flow, are made worse by arterial disease.
A prime example is Alzheimer’s Disease. True Alzheimer’s Disease is mimicked by simple aterio-/athero-sclerosis of the arteries and arterioles supplying the brain. Diabetes is known to be made worse by poor blood flow to the pancreas, and poor blood supply also can cause decreased output of digestive enzymes from the exocrine part of the pancreas, causing incomplete digestion.
Decreased blood supply to the kidneys results in the inappropriate release of angiotensin by the kidneys, inducing hypertension throughout the vascular tree. The joints, particularly the joints of the low back, react with inflammation and pain to decreasing blood flow and this, along with the degeneration of ligament tissue and disc disease, is responsible for the so-called "low back syndrome."
Atherosclerosis plays a big part in the cause of arthritis throughout the body due to poor blood supply to the joints. The effect of this process on the heart is angina (chest pain originating in the heart
) and eventually infarction and death. Poor blood supply to the stomach and small intestines results in poor digestion. Poor blood supply to the colon causes slowing of the colon with resulting colon disease. Poor blood supply to the brain and spinal cord can result in transient ischemic attacks and stroke.
The effect on the extremities is cold hands and feet, and in an advanced case, gangrene of the extremities can result. Impotence can be caused by decreased blood flow to the penis due to clogged arterioles. Frigidity can be caused by decreased blood flow to the pelvis. Cancer is known to be accelerated by decreased blood flow to the affected tissues. When blood flow is decreased to the immunocompetent cells in the bone marrow and spleen, the immune system itself is weakened.
The list of pains, aches, discomforts and diseases caused, or made worse by, Atherosclerosis goes on and on. The above discussion is not complete and could not be made complete unless expanded to book size. Fortunately, there is a way to deal with atherosclerosis. The answer is chelation.
Reversal of the Effects of Atherosclerosis by Intravenous Chelation
In distinction to the oral agents that serve to prevent atherosclerosis, intravenous chelation has been shown to actually reverse the effects of the disease. The agent used is ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid, also known as "EDTA," sold commercially as Sodium Edetate.
EDTA is a synthetic amino acid. The usual dose is 2000-3000 mg. (adjusted to body weight, age, and kidney function) added to 500 ml. of "carrier solution" — sterile water with a mixture of vitamins and minerals. Most chelation doctors add vitamin C along with B vitamins, bicarbonate and magnesium.
The solution is infused slowly, one drop per second, and one treatment requires about three hours. The prisoner (calcium) is moved out of the body using handcuffs (EDTA). The half life of EDTA in the body is one hour; i.e., one-half is removed (filtered into the urine) after one hour, another half of what is left is removed after one more hour, etc. Within 24 hours 99% of the EDTA is gone from the body, and you are left with only the therapeutic benefit.
In addition, to the transitory transport of calcium, many other metal ions are transported and rearranged, which brings up the subject of how EDTA works. In the early days of EDTA therapy, physicians had no idea how it worked. As physicians do, they reached for the nearest reasonable explanation. They said it decalcified the walls of arteries clogged with atherosclerotic plaque, a kind of chemical ROTO-ROOTER(TM). This is now known not to be the only benefit of EDTA, even though decalcification of plaques does occur. The action of EDTA is more complex than the simple-minded comparison with a ROTO-ROOTER can reflect.
To be sure, the action of EDTA is to increase blood flow throughout the body. One of the hallmarks of aging is decreased blood flow to all the organs. It has been shown conclusively: EDTA restores this lost blood flow. How can this happen, if EDTA is not a "ROTO-ROOTER?"
Delivery of oxygen to cells is not explainable by merely comparing the circulatory system to a set of pipes. Blood vessels are living organs, not pipes. Once oxygen is delivered to a cell there is still the matter of how efficiently it can be used. EDTA, as it turns out, operates at all these levels. Here are the effects of EDTA, the final manifestation of which is the healing of degenerative diseases of many kinds.
- EDTA lowers blood calcium and thus stimulates the production of parathormone from the parathyroid glands. This mild pulse of parathormone is responsible for the removal of calcium from abnormal locations (such as arteries) and the deposition of calcium in locations (such as bones) where it should be. This accounts for the mild recalcification of osteoporotic bones seen with EDTA.
- EDTA stimulates the enlargement of small vessels, so that they serve the purpose of collateral circulation around a blockage, rendering the blockage irrelevant.
- EDTA controls free radical damage due to lipid peroxidation by serving as a powerful antioxidant.
- EDTA removes abnormally located metal ions, such as copper and iron, that accumulate with age.
- EDTA removes lead, cadmium, aluminum, mercury and other metals, restoring enzyme systems to their proper functions.
- EDTA enhances the integrity of cellular and mitochondrial membranes.
- EDTA helps reestablish prostaglandin hormone balance. Prostaglandins, among other things, are responsible for the balancing act between contraction and relaxation of arterial walls and between clotting and the free flow of blood. Prostaglandins are produced from fatty acids, therefore lipid peroxidation upsets the balance of these vital hormones. EDTA chelates out the catalyzing metallic co-enzymes and thus inhibits lipid peroxidation, also serving the same function as an antioxidant.
- EDTA reduces the tendency of platelets to cause coagulation too readily. This tends to prevent inappropriate thrombosis, which blocks coronary arteries during a heart attack.
- EDTA increases tissue flexibility by uncoupling age-related cross-linkages that are responsible for loss of skin tone and for wrinkling.
I recommend any individual over the age of forty to have a series of twenty EDTA treatments, followed by six to twelve per year for maintenance after that, simply to restore youthful vitality lost due to aging and atherosclerosis. A person who is already symptomatic with a cardiovascular disease will require more than twenty treatments. We look for the end of troublesome symptoms such as chest pain, leg pain, transient dizziness, intellectual impairment, and fatigue — all attributable to loss of blood flow to vital organs — to know when there have been enough treatments. A good rule of thumb to estimate the maximum number of treatments needed is one treatment for every year of your age, minus 20, but this is only a rough estimate.
You should expect to pay $90-120 per treatment, which admittedly is a nice piece of change. Most people would spend more money on a new car than on their health, so you have to ask yourself how much your health is worth. In the long run, the money you spend on chelation should more than repay itself in health, vitality and the absence of illness. If this were not so, I would not recommend it to you, and I would not be a chelation therapist.
The number of physicians who carry out this procedure is relatively small, but growing rapidly — a few hundred in the U.S. at present. This relative unavailability is surprising, given the great benefits available through this relatively inexpensive, extremely safe treatment.
A Short History of EDTA
EDTA was developed in Germany in the early 1930s as a substitute for citric acid. Citric acid was produced in England and used by Germany for binding mordant dyes. The development of EDTA was part of Germany’s effort to become independent of other countries. No one dreamed at the time that it would ever have a medical use. It has been available in the U.S. for medical purposes since 1948. The controversy has been raging since then, and it is not going away, much to the chagrin of the medical/pharmaceutical complex.
Many physicians who administer EDTA are people who have benefitted from it themselves, many of whom have been brought back from death’s door, most commonly from heart disease. As I write this, I am experiencing the absence of a severe low back pain condition, which had been with me for thirteen years, relief I attribute to ED
TA! Also my hearing, which was beginning to fail, has cleared up dramatically, and my kids are now puzzled that I can hear them from the other room.
I was introduced to EDTA by an 84-year-old former surgeon, Mortimer Weiss, M.D., who had been given a death sentence by a cardiovascular surgeon at age 67 unless he would immediately undergo coronary bypass. He knew the dangers of surgery and looked around for an alternative. He learned of EDTA and through treatment became free of heart disease without the risk of anesthesia or surgery. He then decided to offer EDTA to his patients.
Many physicians are closet chelators who perform chelations on themselves and their loved ones and relatives, but do not offer it to the general public because of the threat of condemnation by the medical community. These physicians are severely constrained by their need to be accepted by their peers. The freedoms we enjoy in America were not won by such people.
One can speculate about why this treatment is not more well-known and commonly administered in modern medicine in the U.S. It is interesting to observe, the patent on EDTA ran out in 1948, and it is therefore very inexpensive, because it can be produced by any drug company and must therefore face free market competition. It hardly matters how effective any drug is, when the patent expires, you probably will not hear much more about it. Drug companies have no fortune to make and thus no motivation to advertise EDTA to doctors. This kind of advertisement, believe it or not, is the most important factor determining which drugs many doctors prescribe, because it is this advertising doctors rely on for the bulk of their "continuing education."
Also, if EDTA became commonly used, there would be a lot of cardiovascular surgeons looking for something else to do, as EDTA is a reasonably priced (cost: $2,000-4000), safe, nonsurgical alternative to balloon angioplasty (cost: around $20,000), and coronary bypass operations (cost: in the range of $50,000!). Many of these surgeons make over two million dollars per year doing drastic procedures for illnesses which could have been prevented with oral chelation, and many — even most — of which can still be treated successfully with EDTA. If these surgeons go out of business so does a section of hospital surgery suites and with those, many hospitals. The economic phalanx lined up against chelation therapy is solid and deep.
It is interesting to note a recent study in a publication called Medical Care (1995;33(7):715-728). This study reports that coronary bypass surgery is 96% more likely to be recommended when the patient is covered by private insurance versus Medicare (which pays less), and 117% more likely to be recommended versus the noninsured (which pays even less).
I recently attended the thirty year reunion at the university where I took my premed training. There I met an old friend who had become a vascular surgeon. This man was a wonderful student who never made less than an "A" on any test. I thought that, of all people, Ed would have looked over the relevant studies and would have a well-thought-out opinion for or against bypass surgery. So, I asked him, "Ed, what do you think of bypass surgery now? Is that good for people? Should we be doing that to people?" His reply: "It pays the bills!" And that was it. I could not persuade him to say anything more about the matter. He did offer that he was looking forward to an early retirement, but he had no more to say about bypass surgery.
One can only speculate about why the mass consciousness of doctors is not simply neutral to EDTA, but is, instead, openly hostile and disparaging. Otherwise open-minded docs will say absurd things like "I don’t know anything about it except it is no good!" How can you know it is no good, if you know nothing about it? My guess: it is a combination of unconsciousness, ignorance and pure capitalism on the part of both pharmaceutical companies and medical practitioners.
Many courageous physicians have faced censure from medical societies, loss of hospital privileges, and worse for administration of this incredibly effective and safe treatment. Those days are coming to an end, however, because of the massive evidence which has accumulated to validate the safety and effectiveness of EDTA and the power of ACAM, the medical society for chelating doctors.
Nevertheless, we cannot take this therapy for granted. As I write, the California Medical Board is striving to regulate the use of EDTA to the point that it will not be available for the conditions for which most people need it. The Board is evenly split on whether to do this or not with (predictably) the vascular surgeon on the Board rabidly for suppression of chelation, despite the evidence of its effectiveness. As one of these rigid, righteous, closed-minded doctors said at a recent board meeting, "As long as chelation therapy was limited to being used by only a few docs, it did not need to be regulated, but now that it is becoming well-known, this ripoff therapy must be suppressed." What he did not say, that is clearly true, is he wants to stamp out the competition to his enormous coronary bypass fees. This meeting was open to the public, and the room was full of hundreds of people whose lives had been saved by chelation, one of whom shouted out "Coronary bypass is the real ripoff !"
Let me quote this surgeon a little more. "If EDTA is so good, let them prove it. Proof is not so hard to get! Let them prove it with controlled, double-blind, placebo studies and then publish these results in the top peer-reviewed journals." He apparently had an attack of attention deficit disorder when these very studies had been presented to the Board only a few minutes before.
Only a few of the thousands of fine studies on EDTA have been published in what were once the distinguished journals of medical research. The reason for this: the pharmaceutical industry bought these journals out with "donations" and advertising dollars years ago. Studies on the uses of EDTA threaten the profits of the pharmaceutical industry with its panoply of patented, toxic, synthetic drugs and the surgical industry with its dangerous unnecessary interventions such as bypass surgery. These studies simply are not allowed to be published in what were once the best medical journals, but that now are disrespected by doctors who are knowledgeable about the political process behind these publications.
Indeed, the surgical, pharmaceutical and hospital industries would like to stamp out chelation therapy. I am sure some people at MacDonald’s would like to outlaw other restaurants and make the Big Mac the required "food" for every person on the planet. Quality meals, like quality medical care, are not served at every standardized outlet. Here is an excellent article on the medical / economic politics of EDTA Chelation therapy by Dr. James P. Carter, M.D., Professor and Head, Nutritional Section, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine New Orleans, Louisiana.
Ten days ago one of my patients finished his course of chelation therapy. He went back for a visit to his cardiologist, who had recommended angioplasty and who strongly opposes chelation therapy. This man informed my patient that chelation therapy is dangerous, unproven, a financial ripoff and then insisted that my patient get back on his Mevacor (a toxic synthetic drug for lowering cholesterol). He then mailed to me a nasty little "progress note." A few days later my patient dropped by my office for a chat and pointed out that as a result of chelation therapy his blood press
ure is down, his diabetes is under control, his arrhythmia is no longer present, and he has a new-found experience of well-being.
When informed by his cardiologist that my fee was a ripoff, my patient reports that he leaned toward that doctor and asked "Just how much does angioplasty cost?" My patient received no answer, and then tried to explain the benefits he experienced from chelation, but the doctor did not want to hear it. Any chelation therapist can tell you several such stories.
My patient did not receive a straight reply that the cost is $20,000 for a two-hour angioplasty — which often is a failure, and if it failed a coronary bypass would have been recommended, costing $50,000. Furthermore, 2% and 5% of patients, respectively, do not survive these procedures. Contrast that with the fact that people simply do not die, nor are they injured, from properly administered chelation therapy. Also, contrast my fee of less than $3,125 for 25 three-hour chelation treatments — which typically are successful. Remember, chelation therapy is supposed to be a financial ripoff and dangerous, according to this doctor.
I am proud to be a physician. I studied and worked hard for my degree. The only time I am embarrassed to be a doctor is when I see performances like this one by a colleague. Ignorance and prejudice do not have to go together, yet they do when perceived financial competition is added to the brew. Nevertheless, I expect — and usually get — more from my colleagues. In this case, I am embarrassed that this man has the same degree I have. I know better than to hope this doctor will change. The facts do not matter to righteous, closed minds. Things will change, but as a result of people like that growing rich, old, retired, and replaced — by a new generation of enlightened doctors.
As of this writing, insurance companies, including Medicare, will not cover the cost of chelation therapy with EDTA, even though the cost is only around $3,000 compared to $15,000 for angioplasty and $50,000 for a bypass. The excuse is, EDTA is not an "accepted" therapy. What that actually means is: not accepted by cardiovascular surgeons who compete with chelation therapy and not accepted by the drug industry, which depends on people remaining sick and taking loads of synthetic drugs, and not accepted by the leading medical journals, which have been bought out by the pharmaceutical and surgical industries.
What is most strange, on the surface, is the fact that insurance companies do not cover the costs of chelation, even though they will shell out for coronary bypass which costs fifteen times as much and treats only two, three or four of the hundreds of arteries in the body. However, if you consider how widespread is the incidence of atherosclerosis, the number of insured people who would need EDTA as a preventive measure is truly astounding, and the cost of covering those people is clearly outside what is possible for any insurance carrier. Perhaps Medicare and the insurance companies have thought rather deeply into what it would cost to cover chelation therapy. Before you have coronary bypass or angioplasty, I recommend that you follow this hyperlink: coronary artery bypass graft and angioplastic surgery indications.
Nevertheless, if you are willing to have your treatment and then sue your insurance company for coverage, you probably will win, provided you present the facts about EDTA clearly. Historically, this has been the case. I have a stack of several hundred scientific articles on EDTA, and I am prepared to prove my point in any forum. You can be too.
Prevention of Atherosclerosis: Antioxidants
An ounce of prevention certainly is worth a pound of cure. The oral antioxidants (sometimes misnamed as "oral chelating agents") serve admirably to prevent or halt the progression of atherosclerosis, but do little to reverse the disease once it is present. You probably already are taking one of the oral antioxidants, vitamin C. Also, fresh vegetables are loaded with other natural and effective chelating agents.
Lactic acid, produced from exercise, is an excellent chelating agent. It is the metabolic byproduct of sustained, vigorous muscle contraction. To get this chelating agent, you must exercise regularly. Exercise also increases your body’s ability to reduce, and thus neutralize, free radicals, which are at the heart of degenerative diseases.
There is a host of more exotic substances (Anginin, Unithol, Vaso Elastin, DMS, NTA, Hexopal Forte, Syntrival) that I think you should ignore, since they are not readily available, they are expensive, and the agents already easily available to you are excellent.
- Clarke NE, Clark CN, Mosher RE The "in vivo" disolution of metastatic calcium: An approach to atherosclerosis. Am J Med Sci 1955;229:142-149.
- Clarke NE, Clark CN, Mosher RE Treatment of angina pectoris with disodium ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid. Am J Med Sci 1956;232:654-666.
- Lamar CP Chelation therapy of occulsive artherosclerosis. J Am Geriatr Soc 1966;14:272-293.
- Bjorksten J The cross-linkage theory of aging as a predictive indicator. Rejuvenation 1980:8:59-66.
- Blumer W, Reich T Leaded gasoline – a cause of cancer. Environmental International, 1980;3:456-471.
- Casdorph HR, Farr CH EDTA chelation therapy III: Treatment of peripheral arterial occlusion, an alternative to amputation. J Holistic Med 1983;5(1):3-15.
- Click here for a complete, selected bibliography for chelation therapy